Search for: "HOUSE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 81 - 100
of 13,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
In fact, according to a search of the House Office of Law Revision Counsel‘s United States Code website, few (only about 35) federal statutes explicitly mention vaccinations. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
At the time the DA was entered, the City's affordable housing in lieu fee was $734 per unit. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1923. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:54 pm
Bills being considered by both houses of the United States Congress may change that for certain remote sellers. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on August 30, 1939. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
Supreme Court of the United States The U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on April 17, 1889. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on June 11, 1907. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:27 am
Trial began Monday with opening remarks in the merger case United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V concerns capital punishment. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:55 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (D. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Michel V. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:09 am
Secretary of State for Defence House of Lords “The Human Rights Act 1998 was capable of applying to acts of a United Kingdom public authority performed outside its territory only where the victim was within the jurisdiction of the UK for purposes of article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]