Search for: "Hackett v. Milbank, Tweed"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Noting that judicial review of an arbitration award "is extremely limited", the Appellate Division, citing Hackett v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, 86 NY2d 146, explained that under CPLR 7511, "an [arbitration] award may be vacated only if (1) the rights of a party were prejudiced by corruption, fraud or misconduct in procuring the award, or by the partiality of the arbitrator; (2) the arbitrator exceeded his or her power or failed to make a… [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Noting that judicial review of an arbitration award "is extremely limited", the Appellate Division, citing Hackett v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, 86 NY2d 146, explained that under CPLR 7511, "an [arbitration] award may be vacated only if (1) the rights of a party were prejudiced by corruption, fraud or misconduct in procuring the award, or by the partiality of the arbitrator; (2) the arbitrator exceeded his or her power or failed to make a… [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the arbitration award and penalty imposed, citing Hackett v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy, 86 NY2d 146. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the arbitration award and penalty imposed, citing Hackett v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy, 86 NY2d 146. [read post]
