Search for: "Hagan v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm
Hagan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:57 am
Hagan, Indianapolis, IN. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:27 pm
Hagan and Patrick L. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 7:34 am
Attorneys for Review Board, et al.; Steve Carter, Thomas Fisher, Heather Hagan and Elizabeth Rogers all of Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Miller Brewing Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
The case is Our Lady of Peace, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Hagan, Kinsella v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:20 am
V. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
Throughout Jim’s legal career, he has tried and won cases at the Superior, Appellate and Supreme Court levels in California. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
