Search for: "Hagler v. State" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 5:18 am
” The court then quoted United States Supreme Court Justice Brewer’s statement in Wheeler v United States, 159 US 523, that "The decision of this question rests primarily with the trial judge [or hearing officer], who sees the proposed [child] witness, notices his manner, his apparent possession or lack of intelligence, as well as his understanding of the obligations of an oath. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hagler is a complicated legal malpractice case arising from a $2 Million dollar demand note, sale of Apple stock, questions of usury and a few appellate decisions. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hagler is a case which displays an unusual degree of latitude in denying a 3211 motion to dismiss. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We reject defendant’s stated effort to shoehorn an alleged appeal from a January 2, 2019 order in Lipin v Danske Bank into this appeal. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We reject defendant’s stated effort to shoehorn an alleged appeal from a January 2, 2019 order in Lipin v Danske Bank into this appeal. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 78 NY2d 207, 216-217 [1991]; Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143, 147 [1974]).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_01252.htm [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hagler discussed but did not decide what happens when law firm A is handling the case (using Attorney 1) and then Attorney 1 takes the case with him to law firm B. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hagler reaffirms the widely understood principle that subsequent attorneys may not be held responsible for acts of prior attorneys. [read post]