Search for: "Haldeman v. Haldeman" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
” In a lengthy footnote, it addresses perhaps the most powerful case marshalled by McKeever in support of his position: Haldeman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:22 pm by Tung Yin
-> Man v. bugs = Heinlein, Starship Troopers -> Man v. far away bugs = Card, Ender's Game -> Man v. alien = Haldeman, The Forever War -> Spiritual v. colonial = Herbert, Dune -> Human v. human = Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (note to self: need to read my copy of this) -> Everyone = Scalzi, Old Man's War [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
We have had 10 years of total control of the air in Laos and V. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
Haldeman, affirming the convictions of the three top defendants in the Watergate scandal. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Margaret Taylor
” In addition, a judge overseeing the grand jury proceedings can authorize disclosure of a grand jury matter for certain purposes, including: (i) preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding; (ii) at the request of a defendant who shows that a ground may exist to dismiss the indictment because of a matter that occurred before the grand jury; (iii) at the request of the government, when sought by a foreign court or prosecutor for use in an official criminal investigation; (iv)… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
 Nixon refused to turn over the tapes made in the Oval Office, lost in the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]