Search for: "Hale v. Kentucky"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 2:25 pm
The lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of Clinton’s email use (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
Hale's order in Maryville Baptist Church, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
The Legal Term opens with the imminent retirement of Lady Hale, President of the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
A federal judge in Kentucky dropped the Massachusetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren and Rep. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
See State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am
“Children are now more likely to see both parents regularly after a divorce, which is a huge win for the children of Kentucky considering research consistently shows shared parenting is in the best interest of children when their parents divorce,” said Matt Hale, Chair of National Parents Organization of Kentucky. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:41 pm
If Jecker was terminated as part of a work force reduction, he would have to "provide 'additional direct, circumstantial, or statistical evidence tending to indicate that the employer singled [him] out ... for discharge for impermissible reasons.'"The case is Jecker v Monumental Life Ins Co, WDKy, May 23, 2016, Hale, D. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
Hale, United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 6:20 am
Hale v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP argued the case for Joel Judulang. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
In Bauman v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
Leja v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
Campell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
No. 2:08-2416 Eastern District of Kentucky Anita Kramer, et al. v. [read post]