Search for: "Hale v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2009, 2:01 am
State: The CCA granted the defendant's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this burglary of a habitation case out of Hale County on the following issues: 1. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:08 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Kenny Courts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:07 am
Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will consider whether the condition attached to claiming a state pension credit, of the right of [...] [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Kimbrough v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:49 pm
The case is Hale, et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:16 am
Yesterday was the 46th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:18 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 to 18 January 2011 Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
There only one case listed in the Supreme Court this week: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 7:46 pm
Hale v Ward County, 848 N.W. 2d 245 (ND 6/24/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 11:15 am
In Hale v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:50 am
The Hales were owners of a house on agricultural land about one mile southeast of a shooting range in Ward County, which is used to train local, state, and federal law enforcement officers. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:30 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 7:52 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
