Search for: "Hale v. State Board of Assessment & Review"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
The Secretary of State referred the case to the Parole Board. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The Secretary of State referred the case to the Parole Board. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
PatentsIn Purity can be unconventional, a new position for the EPO boards of appeal (T 1085/13), GuestKat Rose Hughes takes a look at a recent decision by the EPO Technical Boards of Appeal which departs from previous boards on how the novelty of the increased purity of a known compound is to be assessed. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
(relisted after the June 25 Conference) Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
McCann v The State Hospital Board for Scotland (Scotland), heard 11-12 October 2016. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
McCann v The State Hospital Board for Scotland (Scotland), heard 11-12 October 2016. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
” In assessing the adequacy of these redaction, the Court of Appeal considered this point from the judgment of Baroness Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] UKSC 4): “In making the proportionality assessment under article 8, the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The European Data Protection Board has ordered Google to conduct a full data protection assessment following its acquisition of FitBit, HealthcareIT News reports. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
O’Connor v Bar Standards Board, heard 4 Oct 2017. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
Supreme Court In Christian Institute & Ors v Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51, the appellants sought judicial review of Part 4, averring that it was outwith the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament under the Scotland Act 1998 because it related to matters reserved to the UK Parliament, that it was incompatible with ECHR rights and/or that it was incompatible with EU law. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reviewing New Jersey's venue rules, the Court concluded that "plaintiffs cannot commence an action in New Jersey because the cause of action arose outside its borders" (id. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reviewing New Jersey's venue rules, the Court concluded that "plaintiffs cannot commence an action in New Jersey because the cause of action arose outside its borders" (id. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
On 27 January 2020 the Government published its response to the Cairncross Review on its website. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
So, to hale them into court, the Art Owners must demonstrate that this case falls within one of the FSIA’s exceptions. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
At the colloquium, several scholars reported that some jurisdictions in the world – and some U.S. states – allow for a more moderate and permissive interpretation of fiduciary duties. [read post]
