Search for: "Hale v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Lady Hale also agreed that the Court in Bressol did not accept the A-G’s reasoning. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
Hale v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
* United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
The European Commission’s guidance on the Directive’s transposition and implementation states that family membership in the direct line “extends to adoptive relationships” and calls on member states to secure children’s best interests in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Br. 35–36, but neither did they leave each State wholly free to hale other States before its courts, contra Br. in Opp. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Walden v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
” “California courts may exercise jurisdiction over nonresidents ‘on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
With reference to Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 213, Lady Hale accepted that refusing for religious reasons to perform some aspects of a j [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
Hale v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Parliament had given the Ministers permission to deal with a future situation where patients became entrapped in medium-secure units as they had been in the State Hospital, and a discretion to go further, to deal with other kinds of unit, if it ever became desirable. [read post]
