Search for: "Hall v. Pennsylvania State Police" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Sacred pachyderms, boating while Latino, and police misconduct insurance.Over at the Cato Institute's Daily Podcast, IJ Senior Attorney Robert McNamara explains why the Supreme Court's recent decision in NIFLA v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether police violate the Fourth Amendment by initiating a “knock and talk” investigation at a back door not viewable to members of the public. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Anderson, PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, @asandrson Excerpt: Introduction & Part III[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
After being arrested, the police have the option to either take them to juvenile hall or release them to their parents. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Cecelia Lawshe
After being arrested, the police have the option to either take them to juvenile hall or release them to their parents. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
After being arrested, the police have the option to either take them to juvenile hall or release them to their parents. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 11 August 2020 the ICO released a statement on the Court of Appeal judgment  in R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058)  stating that “we welcome the Court of Appeal’s judgment that provides clarification on the police use of live facial recognition technology in public places. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Deb Ahrens, Sex, Drugs, and Cyberbullies: Reflections on Schooling, Parenting, and Policing.       [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
Remarks of Senator Barack Obama “A More Perfect Union” Constitution Center Tuesday, March 18th, 2008 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania “We the people, in order to form a more perfect union. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
’” Gruender went on to examine “the contours of the right not to speak” under the framework set forth in the Supreme Court’s 1992 plurality opinion in Planned Parenthood of Southeast Pennsylvania v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Internet cases has considered a Pennsylvania court case which found that the police do not have to make details of how they monitor social media available to the public. [read post]