Search for: "Hall v. Social Security Administration Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Judge Hamilton's decision and recommendation is set out below: NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of DEP’T OF SOCIAL SERVICES (DEP’T OF HOMELESS SERVICES) Petitioner - against - VICTORIA MCCAIN Respondent REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TIFFANY HAMILTON, Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the Department of Homeless Services within the Department of Social Services (“DHS”), brought this employee… [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Judge Hamilton's decision and recommendation is set out below: NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of DEP’T OF SOCIAL SERVICES (DEP’T OF HOMELESS SERVICES) Petitioner - against - VICTORIA MCCAIN Respondent REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TIFFANY HAMILTON, Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the Department of Homeless Services within the Department of Social Services (“DHS”), brought this employee… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
” A human operator would then evaluate if a flagged security concern necessitates action. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Bounty was a pregnancy and support club that went into administration in 2020 following an investigation by the Information Commissioner in April 2019, which found that Bounty’s business model was largely based on harvesting data from expectant mothers in order to sell the data on to third parties. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Biden administration argues Congress intended the provision as an anti-corruption measure. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
The social media site will still be called Facebook. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
At issue are nonprofit “social welfare” groups registered under the 501(c)(4) section of the tax code. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
They were popular domestic terrorists even though responsible for, more than 200 bombings and dozens of robberies between 1963 and 1970 that left six people dead, and the kidnapping of the British trade commissioner, and the kidnapping and murder of a Quebec government cabinet minister. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Jeremy Graboyes
Commissioner of Social Security, which the Supreme Court decided in April. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Peter Shane
Securities and Exchange Commission, along with its other much-anticipated decisions, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]