Search for: "Hall v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th 262, 269 (Pavlovich), quoting Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Fla. 2019) (citizen failed to demonstrate that city ordinance, which precluded video and sound recording without consent in city hall and city hall annex, limited public forums, was unreasonable restriction on speech in violation of the First Amendment); Rouzan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Sherin and Lodgen
After a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment, the Superior Court granted the Town’s motion and denied the motion. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
These problems haven’t been ignored in Canada, and in 2010 I wrote a joint piece at The Court with a fellow law student, where we discussed Piedra v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In fairness to the Board, part of this delay was due to the detour through the Federal Court of Appeal on the issue of crown immunity. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]