Search for: "Hall v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am
Lastly, the court justified its decision from a California Court of Appeals holding in the 1983 Hall v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:00 am
Smith, 2020 ONSC 2782, R v Roberts, 2020 ABPC 99, Rodrique Levesque et al v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 10:09 am
Hall v Coconino County Board of Supervisors, 2020 WL 7587117 (AZ App. 12/22/2020) [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Electric Light Co v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th 262, 269 (Pavlovich), quoting Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:46 am
Hall v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
Fla. 2019) (citizen failed to demonstrate that city ordinance, which precluded video and sound recording without consent in city hall and city hall annex, limited public forums, was unreasonable restriction on speech in violation of the First Amendment); Rouzan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
The case is Matorin v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:00 am
Schmidt, et al. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:00 am
Schmidt, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:08 am
Leitch v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
After a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment, the Superior Court granted the Town’s motion and denied the motion. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:48 pm
” (Campbell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm
These problems haven’t been ignored in Canada, and in 2010 I wrote a joint piece at The Court with a fellow law student, where we discussed Piedra v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
