Search for: "Halliburton v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 10:22 am
Halliburton Company, et al., Appellees, Decided March 27, 2020 Read the orders: – United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
” Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
” Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 11:17 am
In the case, United States of America ex rel. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd), heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
Halliburton Co.) and in the TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
United States, the challenge to the constitutionality of the ACA. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
In Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
Here is the abstract: This Essay addresses the Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:31 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:30 pm
The petition of the day is: United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 10:07 am
United Food & Commercial Workers, 23 BRBS 148 (1989). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Halliburton Geophysical Servs., Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm
As the Court confirmed in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
United States, which asks whether a naturalized U.S. citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Medrad, on the other hand, argues that this Court does not have the authority to dismiss its invalidity and unenforceability counterclaims as moot because, according to Medrad, the United States Supreme Court has held that a finding of non-infringement does not moot an invalidity counterclaim. [read post]
