Search for: "Halliburton v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 7:04 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:14 pm
In IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
In a development that has the potential to change the way private securities suits in the United States are litigated, the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court decided Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am
Halliburton, 2010 WL 1268097 (S.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:34 am
Highlighting this difference in approach, both the Halliburton plaintiffs and the United States government (the views of which the Court had solicited) urged the Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Halliburton. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:32 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
In September 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that holding in Jones v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
In 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
United States, the Court affirmed the decision of the Fourth Circuit, holding that a federal sentencing court must determine whether an “offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense, rather than current state law, because the maximum sentence… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
UNITED STATES Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10-779 SORRELL, ATT’Y GEN. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:07 pm
The petition of the day is: Chevron v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 3:57 am
Markstein and State Farm v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
On March 5, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Medrad, on the other hand, argues that this Court does not have the authority to dismiss its invalidity and unenforceability counterclaims as moot because, according to Medrad, the United States Supreme Court has held that a finding of non-infringement does not moot an invalidity counterclaim. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Fisher v. [read post]
