Search for: "Hamdan v. Rumsfeld" Results 161 - 180 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 4:42 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Thus, when Justice Stevens took up the challenge to the legality of President Bush’s military commission system at Guantanamo Bay 60 years later in Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Thus, when Justice Stevens took up the challenge to the legality of President Bush’s military commission system at Guantanamo Bay sixty years later in Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm by Erin Miller
  Thus, when Justice Stevens took up the challenge to the legality of President Bush’s military commission system at Guantanamo Bay sixty years later in Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
You can see the C-SPAN list below the fold. 2000-2001 Term 1-Dec Bush v Palm Beach County Canvassing Board – Agreed 11-Dec Bush v Gore – Agreed 2002-2003 Term 1-Apr Grutter v Bollinger – Agreed 1-Apr Gratz v Bollinger – Agreed 2003-2004 Term 8-Sep McConnell v FEC – Agreed 20-Apr Rasul v Bush and Al Oday v US – Agreed 27-Apr Cheney v US District Court – Agreed 28-Apr Hamdi… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
In Rasul v Bush and Hamdan v Rumsfeld, Stevens asserted the role of the courts even in wartime determinations of the fate of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
In cases involving prisoners held without charge at the American naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and the mentally retarded on death row, his version of American justice propelled by common sense and moral clarity commanded a majority.In perhaps the most significant case, Hamdan. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:01 am
According to the NYT, Senator Kyl was shocked, shocked to learn that AG Holder had not listed in his pre-confirmation questionnaire his "signing" of a brief in the Padilla v Rumsfeld case. [read post]