Search for: "Hamilton v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Professor Hamilton blogs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Article V, which permits amendment, exists because the Framers were persuaded that the powerful would find ways to circumvent the limits that were built in. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It was declared unconstitutional in 1997 in Boerne v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hamilton is the Fels Institute of Government Professor of Practice, and Fox Family Pavilion Resident Senior Fellow in the Program for Research on Religion at the University of Pennsylvania; the founder, CEO, and Academic Director of the nonprofit think tank to prevent child abuse and neglect, CHILD USA, and author of God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty and Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the case comes from Marci Hamilton, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, “whatever the Court does, employers and employees have good reason to demand clearer guidance from Congress. [read post]