Search for: "Hampton v. People"
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
The cook then saw Hampton leave in a white four-door sedan. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 8:47 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:59 pm
Hampton poses a simple question: should the Court overrule its 1948 decision in People ex rel. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:39 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:58 pm
” [See] United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:21 am
”’” People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
Pratt v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:54 am
In an R v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:40 am
And per this ‘one-to-many correspondence’, the relevant public will not interpret ‘HAMPTON’ as designating the geographical origin of goods or services.In view of the above, the Court identified the sign’s overall distinctiveness and corrected the CNIPA’s decision.The CNIPA appealed to the Beijing Higher People’s Court, mainly arguing that the Chinese translation of ‘HAMPTON’, ‘汉普顿’, is… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Did you know that most people are legally and lawfully eligible to be tax exempt? [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 8:18 pm
I think I am sorry that I read your concurring opinion this summer in Kansas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:16 am
People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 8:20 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
According to a recent Michigan Court of Appeals case Hampton v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:51 am
” Suddenly, people who got on Google to find McCormick Law Firm are being hit with ads for Hampton Law Office. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:18 pm
ACORN v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:56 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Bland v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 2:13 pm
[Excess of Democracy] * How terrifying is Heien v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
The companies, joint defendants in Higginson v. [read post]
