Search for: "Handel v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
In a recent case, Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream & Yogurt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
Frank Hoffmeister, Wider die German Angst – Ein Plädoyer für die transatlantische Handels- und Investitionspartnerschaft (TTIP)Steffen Hindelang, Repellent Forces: The CJEU and Investor-State Dispute Settlement Beiträge und BerichteFelix Würkert, Historische Immunität? [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:27 pm
Handel’s Enters. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 3:10 am
Phillips v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
On 26 September 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in Salzgitter Mannesmann Handel GmbH v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 11:56 pm
In an unpublished opinion, the appellate court affirmed a district court’s finding that the franchisor had a likelihood of success at trial and would be irreparably harmed absent a preliminary injunction barring the franchisee from setting up a competing ice cream parlor (Handel’s Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Similarly, in SRB v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:45 am
Svensk Handel AB, Case C-194/16). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:07 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: SC19100 - Greenwald v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:02 pm
Supreme Court in Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:55 am
Svensk Handel AB; see our previous post here). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
I read this passage as suggesting that the much-maligned “economic/non-economic” distinction in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:33 am
Völkerrecht und Weltwirtschaft im 19. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
To uphold such a claim . . . would be to disregard the principles governing reissued patents, stated upon great consideration by this court at the last term in the case of Miller v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:29 am
Thus, absent an attorney-client relationship, a cause of action for legal malpractice cannot be stated (Baystone Equities, Inc. v Handel-Harbour, 27 AD3d 231 [2006]; Linden v Moskowitz, 294 AD2d 114, 115 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 505 [2003]). [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:57 pm
The latest decision dealing with online jurisdiction comes in the shape of Bolagsupplysningen OÜ and Ingrid Ilsjan v Svensk Handel AB (Case C‑194/16), an online defamation case. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm
In the case of Brian Handel, D.M.D., P.C. v. [read post]
