Search for: "Hankin v. Hankin"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2008, 5:15 am
Subpoena Duces TecumBd. of Educ. v Hankins, App. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:23 am
Zigtema and Sarah Morrison Rapelye won in State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
Hankins v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 8:16 am
Affirmed.Case Name: ROBERT STEVEN HANKINS v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:15 am
In Hankins v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:30 pm
The petition of the day is: Hankins v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 10:45 pm
There used to be a very old rule whereby counsel was entitled to their full brief fee once the brief had been delivered even if the case settled before the date fixed for the hearing. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 8:01 am
She and her family filed Hankins v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:08 am
Subpoena Duces Tecum Bd. of Educ. v Hankins, 294 A.D.2d 360 From time to time one reads about a case involving the serving of a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:44 am
In a short, one line reversal, the Court of Appeals put to rest a very old legal malpractice case, Gotay v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:58 pm
In 2013, the United State Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:50 am
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/01/31/v-fullstory/2615925/golden-years.html#storylink=cpy [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:15 pm
Anthony Hankins, No. 109,123 (Johnson)Motion to correct illegal sentence (petition for review)Sarah Morrison Rapelye (brief); Catherine A. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 11:35 am
In Thaxton v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 11:34 pm
In Hankins v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Some exceptions to the Doctrine of the Exhaustion of Administrative RemediesMcLaughlin v Hankin, 2015 NY Slip Op 07272, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn a CPLR Article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of the president of Westchester Community College to terminate petitioner Catherine McLaughlin’s employment with the college, the college raised an affirmative defense contending that McLaughlin failed to exhaust her administrative remedies under the relevant… [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 10:16 pm
A few district courts had rejected the argument, see Hankins v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:38 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Arkansas Rule of Evidence 606(b) indicates that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
