Search for: "Hankin v. Hankin" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
The Appellate Division ruled that Hankin attempted to use the subpoena duces tecum improperly and such a subpoena "may not be used for purposes of discovery or to ascertain the existence of evidence" [Board of Educ. of City of New York v Hankins 294 A.D.2d 360].** Sometimes an individual served with disciplinary charges will demand "a bill of particulars" requiring the appointing authority to set out the charges and specifications filed against the… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division ruled that Hankin attempted to use the subpoena duces tecum improperly and such a subpoena "may not be used for purposes of discovery or to ascertain the existence of evidence" [Board of Educ. of City of New York v Hankins 294 A.D.2d 360].Sometimes an individual served with disciplinary charges will demand "a bill of particulars" requiring the appointing authority to set out the charges and specifications filed against the… [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBankruptcy Minister's Age Discrimination Suit Dismissed; Action Would Breach Religious Freedom and Restoration Act Hankins v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Reynolds v Ross, Suchoff, Hankin, Maidenbaum, Handwerker & Mazel, P.C  Justice Gische has to choose between two opposing narratives. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 92743 (WD PA, Sept. 7, 2010), a Pennsylvania federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (Hankins v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ross, Suchoff, Egert, Hankin, Maidenbaum & Mazel, P.C., No. 96 CIV. 1756 (LAP), 1997 WL 171011, *6 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]