Search for: "Hannon v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2009, 3:49 pm
No. 15), the Court announced they changed the test to conform with the 2006 United States Supreme Court case Brigham City v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:17 pm
Category: Civil Procedure   By: Christian Hannon, Contributor  TitleTaylor v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am by Barry Sookman
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:38 pm
Category: Administrative Law     By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitlePresident & Fellows of Harvard v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:23 pm
Category: Civil Procedure    By: Christian Hannon, Contributor  TitleMemorylink v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:57 pm
Category: ITC      By: Christian Hannon, Contributor  TitleuPI Semiconductor Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
    The American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and another group, the Arc of the United States, urged the Court to take the case of Briseno v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: Christian Hannon, Contributor    TitleMicrosoft Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:41 pm
Category: Licensing     By: Christian Hannon, Contributor  TitleWi-LAN USA Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]