Search for: "Hansen v. People" Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
Yes, this means that if some people do more than expected to reduce emissions, they’ll just free up permits for others â€" which worries Hansen. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:21 am by David Friedman
This is the second time I have noticed Hansen getting something right. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
(California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, July 31, 2018, Hansen v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:41 am
 Justice Richman joined the Court of Appeal over eight years ago, but the first time he used that phrase was two years ago -- in two different opinions -- and then used it again last year and, thus far, has used it again in two different opinions in 2014.The latest people to nonpluss Justice Richman are insurance adjuster Craig Hansen and his attorneys at Horvitz & Levy ("Appeals Are What We Do") and Weston & McElvain ("Building a Reputation"). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
 Property rights restrict what we can do with other people's property. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Sharon Visor also handed flyers to people visiting Hansen’s and Streeter’s offices and placed flyers on vehicles in the parking lot. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:47 am by Terry Hart
If other professions were paid like artists — “Jeez, people with jobs, why you keep demanding money and stuff?! [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
Hansen Chavis, a federal public defender, told the justices that interpreting the law to apply only to federal clemency would render its language meaningless in many cases, as people convicted of state crimes are not eligible for federal clemency. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
By Glen Hansen The recent decision by the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District in Urban Habitat Program v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:07 pm
Mary Hansen, a criminalist, found evidence of semen on vaginal and rectal swabs. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:59 am by Giles Peaker
R(Anon) v LB Southwark (Claim No CO/2035/2014 – settled by consent) Courtesy of Hansen Palomares Solicitors comes news of this settled Judicial Review of LB Southwark’s gatekeeping practices on homeless applications. [read post]