Search for: "Hard v. Strange et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Alexander Quarterman et al. 2013-1591. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
Interclick, Inc., et al., 10-cv-09183-DAB (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Islamic Republic of Iran et al. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm
It’s hard to undo a crappy streaming deal, but making a crappy AI streaming deal will make it exponentially harder when Spotify and Google et al will rub your nose in the AI benchmark. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
[This is a 6k+ word blog post that was joyless to write and most likely will be joyless to read.] [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:44 am
Assuming that they don’t fear for their lives and shoot me (it is Texas after all), it’s hard to see what crime I would be committing. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:52 am
Brody, et al., 11-civ-4164 (S.D.N.Y.; Dec. 16, 2011).) [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:28 am
Lamken for respondents Paloma Gaos et al. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:04 pm
The Little Sisters et al. said that they were burdened, the Court and the government didn’t seem to want to second-guess this, and so we had to move on to the rest of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA): compelling interest, least restrictive means. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
If Einstein, Darwin, Kelvin et al. can misfire, who is to say that a law professor is perfect? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 9:01 am
Synthes Spine Co., et al., 2010 WL 2569058 (C.D. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
This week's case under review is Modern Holdings, LLC et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
While it would seem strange to us now in Canada, it was once argued that in-house lawyers should not be allowed to give legal advice to their employers because their independence of judgment would be comprised by their employment[6]. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
The amicus brief submitted by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights et al. does an especially nice job of explaining why laws enacted through popular vote should be carefully scrutinized when their impact falls particularly hard on people of color or other protected groups. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
A lawyer who commences a sexual relationship necessarily creates “a substantial risk that the lawyer’s representation of the client would be materially and adversely affected” [emphasis added] (FLS Model Code, Rule 3.4-1, Comm’y 2 – also R v Neil 2002 SCC 70 et al). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:26 am
Background The case of Martin, et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:57 am
” Ellsworth, et al., Juror Comprehension and Public Policy: Perceived Problems and Proposed Solutions, 6 Psychology, Public Policy and Law788, 795-6 (Sept. 2000)(citations omitted). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Rheingold et al proudly write, "Not only did the court deny all pending motions, he denied all future ones! [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Bartrip, “Irving John Selikoff and the Strange Case of the Missing Medical Degrees,” 58 J. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:40 pm
Cited Madge v. [read post]
