Search for: "Hardison v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hardison, 432 U.S. 63, 84 (1977), which stated that employers suffer an “undue hardship” in accommodating an employee’s religious exercise whenever doing so would require them “to bear more than a de minimis cost,” misinterprets § 2000e(j) and should be overruled. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:19 am by Josh Blackman
(Without comment, the court this week also denied a second case on the same issue, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Dalberiste v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
- Chicago attorney Jonathan Rosenfeld on Strellis & Field's Chicago Nursing Home Lawyer Blog Jones Day v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am by Andrew Hamm
Hardison, which stated that employers suffer an “undue hardship” in accommodating an employee’s religious exercise whenever doing so would require them “to bear more than a de minimis cost,” misinterprets 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:06 am by Nick Reo
Several of the papers in this series will be of interest to Turtle Talk readers, including a unique analysis of Lyng v. [read post]