Search for: "Hardy v. Hardy" Results 201 - 220 of 691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 12:12 pm
There's hard core and then there's hard core.The majority -- Judges Tallman and Friedland -- hold that the NCAA is allowed to categorically bar felons from coaching at NCAA-certified youth athletic tournaments even if that rule has a disparate impact on minorities.The concurrence -- Judge Faber, sitting by designation from West Virginia -- totally agrees, and would also go further and expressly hold that Title II doesn't even allow disparate impact claims in the first place.And Judge… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
. * Malcolm Weatherup v Nationwide News – more than $100,000 to a retired journalist accused of being “habitually intoxicated”, QLD. * Sean Carolan v Fairfax Media and Peter FitzSimons – $300,000 to a personal trainer accused of injecting football players with a banned substance and being involved with organised crime, NSW. * Raelene Hardie v The Herald & Weekly Times and Andrew Rule – $250,000 to a strip-club owner, Victoria. *… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
As you may recall, the FTC is pursuing 1-800 Contacts for antitrust violations based on 1-800 Contacts having sued and then settled with competitors who bought keyword ads on 1-800 Contacts’ trademarks. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by John Elwood
The hardy duo of returning relists are joined this week by four new hopefuls. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has posted online on YouTube at this link the video of today's oral argument before a three-judge panel in Hardie v. [read post]