Search for: "Harkins v. Harkins" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 1:20 pm
I completely agree with Judge Hug on this one.Does the ADA require movie theaters to help blind or deaf people watch movies? [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:43 am by Aimee Denholm
On appeal from: [2015] NICA 31 This appeal considered whether a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 156 can be made by a Crown Court in circumstances where the defendant is convicted in proceedings before that Crown Court of an offence or offences which were committed before 24 March 2003, given the stipulations of the commencement, transitional and savings provisions set out in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Commencement No5, Transitional Provisions, Savings and Amendments)… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Andrew Frisch
Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), Chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee and Sen.  [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by Epstein Becker Green
  The bill seeks to return age discrimination plaintiffs to the standard the Senators believe they were subject to prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gross v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by Epstein Becker Green
  The bill seeks to return age discrimination plaintiffs to the standard the Senators believe they were subject to prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gross v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by Epstein Becker Green
  The bill seeks to return age discrimination plaintiffs to the standard the Senators believe they were subject to prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gross v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by Epstein Becker Green
  The bill seeks to return age discrimination plaintiffs to the standard the Senators believe they were subject to prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gross v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
In the recent case of Abdulrazaq and others v Hassan and others [2021] EWHC 3252 (QB) no proceedings were brought by the Trustees of Exeter Mosque, the Defendants, over the initial allegedly defamatory publication by the Claimants (who were once members and attendees of Exeter Mosque). [read post]