Search for: "Harley v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
Grimaldi) [3] Id. at 14. [4] Id. at 15. [5] See Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
Grimaldi) [3] Id. at 14. [4] Id. at 15. [5] See Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Harley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 12:44 am
You may think that motorbikes like the Harley Davidson offer extreme comfort, which is true to some extent, but these types of motorbikes cannot reduce the impact of unmaintained roads in the state. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
Under Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:54 am
Harley’s practice covers the United States and Consulates worldwide. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
Most recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
Most recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am
Harley-Davidson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:48 am
VA 1-987-746 and the United States Trademark Registrations below (collectively “Harley’s Intellectual Property”). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
The 7th Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Chicago affirmed a verdict by the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
See Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
For example, in Golden State Transit Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 8:55 am
Wisconsin pending in the United States Supreme Court., One noteworthy presentation came from a former prosecutor. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:24 am
Facts: This case (Griffith et al v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
I didn’t come up with that — the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, predecessor to the Federal Circuit — did, in a well-known case called Bart Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Inherent in this process is recognition that a lexical unit is functioning as a referent and not as a description. [read post]
