Search for: "Harley v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
Under Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:54 am
Harley’s practice covers the United States and Consulates worldwide. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
Most recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
Most recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am
Harley-Davidson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:48 am
VA 1-987-746 and the United States Trademark Registrations below (collectively “Harley’s Intellectual Property”). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
The 7th Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Chicago affirmed a verdict by the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
See Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
For example, in Golden State Transit Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 8:55 am
Wisconsin pending in the United States Supreme Court., One noteworthy presentation came from a former prosecutor. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:24 am
Facts: This case (Griffith et al v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
Davis, George Harley, and John D. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
I didn’t come up with that — the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, predecessor to the Federal Circuit — did, in a well-known case called Bart Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Inherent in this process is recognition that a lexical unit is functioning as a referent and not as a description. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:31 am
Roberts read a decision, from United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Greenmoss, supra (alteration in original) (quoting Harley–Davidson Motorsports, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:52 am
Harley-Davidson, Inc., 270 Wisc.2d 146, 169, 677 N.W.2d 233 (2004); Frank v. [read post]
