Search for: "Harper v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2018, 7:52 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Gun and ammo possession Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Ronald Harper, Jr., appellant, was convicted of carrying a handgun concealed or openly about his person and possession of ammunition after having been convicted of a disqualifying crime. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:25 am by William A. Jacobson
The post Supreme Court Rejects “Independent State Legislature” Theory In Moore v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Second-degree murder Following a trial in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, a jury convicted appellant, Victor Steven Harper, of second-degree murder and the use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence.1 The trial court sentenced appellant to a total prison term ... [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm by Jim Lindgren
Harper, argued today in the Supreme Court: Donald Trump's Constitution and Moore v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm by Rick Hasen
Harper and state courts” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Harper Haunts State and Federal Constitutional Interpretation of … Continue reading The post A Justice’s Perspective on Moore v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 10:30 am by Derek Muller
Harper and the Perils of Finding ‘Compromise’ on the Independent State Legislature Theory. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:48 pm by Rick Hasen
Harper rejected the most extreme version of the independent state legislature theory, it endorsed another theory that amounts to a “time bomb:” It is indeed a cause for… Continue reading The post Social Choice Theory, the Independent State Legislature Theory, Insincere Voting, and the Missing Liberal Dissents in Moore v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm by Dan
Harper v Virginia Bd. of Elections Even with the new amendment, states, like Virginia, continued their poll tax practices because the amendment did not specifically speak to state elections. [read post]