Search for: "Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2019, 12:23 pm
The statute identifies four non-exhaustive  factors to be considered in a fair use inquiry: (1) the purpose and character of the use; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the substantiality of the portion used; and (4) the effect on the potential market or value of the copyrighted work and its derivatives (citing Harper & Row v Nation Enterprises).In line with the common judicial approach, the court placed most importance on the first… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
To frame that discussion,  I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
To frame that discussion,  I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
Nation Enterprises, 471 US 539, 549 (1985), quoting H. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:17 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court said in Harper & Row v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
At National Review Online’s Bench Memos, Jonathan Keim discusses last week’s opinion in McFadden v. [read post]