Search for: "Harper v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Rick Hasen
Harper, Rejecting Maximalist Version of Independent State Legislature Theory But Giving Federal Courts a Chance to Second Guess Some State Rulings as “Transgressing the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 9:58 am by Rick Hasen
Harper (Independent State Legislature); Now UPDATED with Analysis and Reason to Think Court Will Reject Maximalist Version of ISLT appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:53 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (1): In Canon Harper and Adrian Porch v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
Harper, but he, more than anyone, is the biggest loser in the case. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 7:18 pm by Rick Hasen
Harper, one of the more consequential cases in recent years, the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Structural Democracy Project released their latest report, Independent State Legislature Theory Undermines Elections Principles. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Marcia Oddi
Yesterday's Court of Appeals decision in Canon Harper and Adrian Porch v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm by Rick Hasen
Harper doubled down on the assertion that when state legislatures… Continue reading The post Ethan Herenstein: “Can State Legislatures Exercise Federal Legislative Power? [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Henry Chambers
Harper, Confusion on the Court: Distinguishing Disparate Treatment from Disparate Impact in Young v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:10 am by Jason Mazzone
Harper (the independent state legislature case), Akhil and Vik Amar have an amicus brief in this term's Moore v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 10:29 am by Derek Muller
Harper, which concerns the definition of “legislature” in Article I’s Elections Clause and the so-called independent state legislature theory (ISLT). [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As Loreburn E. stated at pp. 320-21 in Adam v. [read post]