Search for: "Harrell v State" Results 21 - 40 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2009, 11:36 am
The subcontractor objected, stating that it had not breached the contract and the contractor did not have an unfettered right to terminate.At trial, the Circuit Court of Maryland for Baltimore County found that the subcontractor did not breach the contract. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
Authority presented by the mortgagor even suggested that HUD did not contemplate its regulations to support affirmative state law claims by aggrieved mortgagors.On the other hand, the Court held, "ample authority" suggests that alleged violations of the regulations may be asserted defensively to halt a foreclosure action. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 9:21 pm
Now, you may remember that in the Lee Harrell deposition on October 31, Harrell testified that Scruggs threatened to support an opponent in the Democratic primary of Insurance Commissioner George Dale unless Dale supported Scruggs' proposal to set himself up as some sort of Katrina Czar over a $500 million slush fund that was to be squeezed out of State Farm. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:18 pm
The Court notes, however, that since the rule was last affirmed by the Court in Harrison v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:33 am
After more than five years of deliberation and challenges such as Harrell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:50 am by Brian A. Comer
I have been hearing for awhile that there is a chance that the South Carolina State Legislature may take action in response to the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Branham v. [read post]