Search for: "Harrington v. California" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  That issue was raised by the state of California in Harrington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
”) At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood writes about a petition that has been relisted twice, Harrington v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of the American Legion Department of California Amicus brief of nine states Title: CropLife America v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
Booker in 2005 ([origin.www.supremecourtus.gov]) and Cunningham v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Docket: 08-674 Title:   NRG Power Marketing, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Harrington et al Nebraska District Court Filed: March 7, 2008 Plaintiff: Adrienne Meints, Adrienne Meints Defendant: Shane Harrington, Meltech Case Number: 4:2008cv03043 National Truck Equip Assn v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 3:35 pm
  Last week, a California Court of Appeal took a step towards leveling the playing field in Harrington v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Sexual abuse of young children is even more likely to go unreported for many reasons, including dependence on caretakers, minimal interaction with outside protectors, underdeveloped cognitive abilities, and diminished capacity to articulate (Finkelhor, Ormrod, Turner, & Hamby, 2005; Fontanella, Harrington, & Zuravin, 2000). [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
And, according to Justice Perluss, what it did do to anyone who wanted to visit inmates at various California prisons between 1999 and 2001:"The Secure 1000 discharged low-level backscatter X-rays that penetrated a few centimeters into a person's skin, producing a spectral-like computer image of the body, including an outline of breasts, genitalia and folds of skin. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 11:51 pm
Van Arsdall, supra, 475 U.S. at 682 n.5 (describing Harrington v. [read post]