Search for: "Harrington v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
  To the case page for United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:08 pm by Anna Christensen
United States has been updated to include two new amicus briefs, while the case page for Harrington v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:54 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: AC33291 - Local 84, Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, it Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:49 am by sally
Supreme Court Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd & Ors (Ver 2) [2011] UKSC 17 (6 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jenson & Anor v Faux [2011] EWCA Civ 423 (13 April 2011) Garratt v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 425 (13 April 2011) Secretary of State for the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Affairs v Maftah & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 350 (13 April 2011) Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v The Albert… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm by David Oscar Markus
There is no dispute that, during the capital trial of petitioner Davel Chinn, the State suppressed exculpatory evidence indicating that the State’s key witness, Marvin Washington, had an intellectual disability that may have affected Washington’s ability to remember, perceive fact from fiction, and testify accurately....Because Chinn’s life is on the line, and given the substantial likelihood that the suppressed records would have changed the outcome at … [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am by John Elwood
Humphries, 09–350 (relisted on 1/8/10, 1/15, and, apparently, 1/22), and Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
Humphries -- civil liability of county for erroneous placement on child abuser listTuesday, October 12 (the big day for CJLF):Harrington v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am by David Cosgrove
Last month the Supreme Court of Mississippi handed down its 6-3 split opinion in the matter of Harrington v. [read post]