Search for: "Harris v Barbera"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
In Harris v Barbera 2018 NY Slip Op 05023 Decided on July 5, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department (without much explanation) held that while the complaint stated a cause of action for failing to illuminate marital dissipation, the proofs were not. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:19 am
In the spirit of anecdotal evidence, we look at Harris v Barbera 2012 NY Slip Op 04973 Decided on June 20, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:34 am
His opposition consisted entirely of speculative and conclusory assertions (see Sang Seok NA v Schietroma, 163 AD3d 597, 599; Harris v Barbera, 163 AD3d 534, 535; Schadoff v Russ, 278 AD2d 222, 223). [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:43 am
Student note: A court may freely consider affidavits submitted by the plaintiff to remedy any defects in the complaint, and upon considering such an affidavit, the facts alleged therein must also be assumed to be true.Case: Harris v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
“A plaintiff in an action alleging legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney’s failure to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession proximately caused the plaintiff to suffer damages” (Harris v Barbera, 163 AD3d 534, 535). [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am
Moreover, to the extent that the complaint was vague as to the nature of the allegations of legal malpractice and otherwise deficient, the evidence submitted, including the plaintiff’s affidavit, sufficiently remedied any pleading defects and put the defendants on notice of the grounds for her [*2]cause of action alleging legal malpractice (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d at 873; Harris v Barbera, 96 AD3d 904, 906; cf. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Harris, 188 N.J. 415 (2006), the Legislature enacted Public Law 2006, Chapter 103,establishing civil unions for same-sex couples effective February 19, 2007. [read post]
