Search for: "Harris v. City of Santa Monica"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 8:07 am
City of Santa Monica this morning at 10:00 a.m. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:59 am
City of Santa Monica -- the issues it settles and the questions it leaves for another day. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:07 am
City of Santa Monica (2/7/13) --- Cal. ---. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
City of Santa Monica, and on January 23, it did just that. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:16 pm
City of Santa Monica, but a few people have asked for more information on the webinar, which will air on February 22, 2013, from 12:00 to 1:15 p.m. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
City of Santa Monica in the wake of a lawsuit filed against his daughter that could be affected by the Supreme Court ruling. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:25 am
City of Santa Monica has been pending before the California Supreme Court since 2011. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:50 am
City of Santa Monica, announcing whether and to what extent a “mixed motive” defense is available to an employer under the Fair Employment Housing Act (“FEHA”). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:00 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Governor Brown has vetoed legislation intended to address the California Supreme Court's decision in Harris v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm
The Supreme Court of California determined in Harris v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:16 pm
City of Santa Monica as a compromise between employee rights and business’ freedom to terminate employees. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
City of Santa Monica, the issues it settles, and the questions it leaves for another day. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm
City of Santa Monica), David deRubertis (counsel on the plaintiff's side in Harris), Kimberly Kralowec (blogging here, of course), Norm Pine (who argued the plaintiff's side in Harris), and Felix Shafir (Horvitz & Levy).How to make a big name for yourself? [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
City of Santa Monica, but even if you do not practice in this area, the prevalence of arbitration agreements in employment makes this a very important case. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 10:58 am
City of Santa Monica specifically dealt with a mixed motive case. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:55 pm
City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal.4th 203 (2013). [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
City of Santa Monica oral argument, and I believe that he is likely the one turning the Court's focus to the remedies available here. [read post]
