Search for: "Harris v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
The decision, UPMC Braddock v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:39 am
In Harris v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:31 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:26 am
Harris v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:44 pm
On May 24, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Harris v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
District of Columbia, 433 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:28 am
District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, No. 0008613-09 (D.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
The case of Harris v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit about the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:27 pm
The trial court denied the motion, and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:47 am
Former District of Columbia Councilmember Harry Thomas Jr., who pleaded guilty earlier this year to embezzling public funds, was ordered today to pay $353,000 in restitution to the city. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 10:22 am
Harry Barko v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
DRE]In 1910, two developers, Harry Willson and Harry Wardman, built a block of six rowhouses on the west side of Thirteenth Street, N.W., a north-south artery in the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:15 am
District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, (DC Super. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:56 pm
Warren Harris v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
The district court in Johnson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
John Edward Green, Jr., the defendant in Texas v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:58 pm
District of Columbia, 598 F. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
