Search for: "Harris v. District of Columbia" Results 41 - 60 of 345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2021, 9:27 am by Robert Chesney
District Court for the District of Columbia did something we have not seen in many a year: He granted a Guantanamo detainee’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ordering the man’s release. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Columbia Abedini v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
Brand was admitted to the District of Columbia Bar in 1981. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
Brand was admitted to the District of Columbia Bar in 1981. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia use ad valorem taxes; only seven states assess a flat surcharge; and two states levy both an ad valorem tax and a flat-dollar surcharge. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Tatel, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and Steven R. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
District of Columbia, 20-331, involves D.C. and Maryland’s domestic emoluments clause challenge to Trump’s ownership interests in hotels and restaurants, and specifically the availability of the writ of mandamus to correct claimed errors. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
Attorney for the District of Columbia Michael Sherwin told reporters last week that his office “organized a strike force...whose only marching orders from me are to build seditious [conspiracy] charges related to the most heinous acts that occurred in the capitol. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:45 pm by Matt Cooper
District of Columbia: In Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
District Court for the District of Columbia temporarily blocked a rule that would have placed new restrictions on the federal government’s food assistance program, known as SNAP. [read post]