Search for: "Harris v. District of Columbia"
Results 81 - 100
of 347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. (1971). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
” The city’s appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
Harris Teeter, LLC). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:29 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:29 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy late last month. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
Johnson, No. 06-1071 Galveston Central Appraisal District v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (District of Columbia 1923) which required that expert be dismissed and be sufficiently established in the field to have gained general acceptance. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
District of Columbia , 487 F.3d 941 (D.C.Cir. 2007), which held that a public use challenger need not seek compensation in state procedures before coming to federal court. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
–Harris v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:26 am
Harris v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia providing more detail on Paul Manafort’s alleged breach his plea agreement, and both Mueller’s team and the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
In Middleton v. [read post]
