Search for: "Harris v. Quinn" Results 221 - 240 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2013, 10:15 am by Workplace Prof
Charlotte Garden (Seattle) and Matt Bodie (SLU) write to tell us that a group of labor law professors is submitting an amicus brief in support of the union and state respondents in Harris v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
” ACSblog’s series of posts on Harris v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:36 am by Amy Howe
” At ACSblog, Kent Greenfield suggests that Harris v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
At ACSblog, Charlotte Garden previews the January argument in Harris v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Quinn — state power to require home-care providers to pay fees to a labor union to represent them before state agencies 12-1315 — Petrella v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Alexander Volokh, Reason Foundation] Even as anti-bullying programs backfire, some propose extending them to workplace [Hans Bader, CEI, earlier] Background on Harris v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
  Correction: Yesterday, I erroneously listed the oral argument date for Harris v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
  Correction: Yesterday, I erroneously listed the oral argument date for Harris v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:20 pm
Argument set for November 4, 2013.Mandatory Dues In Harris v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:25 am
Argument set for November 4, 2013.Mandatory Dues In Harris v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
  At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn discusses the grant in Harris v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
In Harris v Quinn (Dkt No 11-681), assisted by the National Right to Work Foundation, a group of Medicaid home-based personal care providers filed a class-action federal suit against Illinois Governor Pat Quinn and Illinois SEIU and AFSCME locals over an executive order that designated 20,000 providers as public employees for collective bargaining purposes. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am by Amy Howe
MGM, a dispute over the copyright for the movie “Raging Bull,” and Harris v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 9:13 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court yesterday granted certiorari in Harris v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:51 pm by Will Baude
Quinn is a “sleeper” case in which the Court might overrule or dramatically limit its prior precedent in Abood v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Here, in summary, are the other two granted cases: * Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
 The fate of three-time-relist Harris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 Conference) Harris v. [read post]