Search for: "Harris v. Quinn"
Results 41 - 60
of 280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2013, 10:18 am
The case, Harris v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:39 pm
A three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit ruled today in Harris v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:15 pm
SEIU (2012) and Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
In Harris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:17 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 Monday in Harris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
They have some thoughts on Jones v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:55 am
Released the same day as Hobby Lobby -to no public fanfare - Harris v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:44 am
SEIU (2012) and Harris v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 3:31 am
In Harris v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm
Columnist George Will cites the Cato Institute amicus brief in Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
By Jim Cline In a decision on a case that had presented significant financial and operational important to Public Employee Unions, the United States Supreme Court held this Monday in Harris v Quinn that the Illinois law, as applied to a special class of home health care workers, unconstitutionally imposed a “fair share” dues payment […]The post In Closely Watched Decision, Supreme Court declines to Hold Mandatory Union Dues Clauses Unconstitutional… [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:50 am
Dahilia Lithwick, After Hobby Lobby, McCullen and Harris v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 3:33 am
The concluding-frenzy stage of the Supreme Court term is upon us; my colleague Ilya Shapiro handicaps the remaining big cases including Bond (treaty power), Hobby Lobby, Harris v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 5:47 am
Coakley, which deals with speech outside of health care facilities where abortions are performed, and Harris v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Quinn (mandatory union dues) 2012 Joined amicus of blue states in HHS v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:11 pm
[Updated: 2:13] Our symposium on Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
The Court decided yesterday in Harris v. [read post]