Search for: "Harris v. Quinn"
Results 41 - 60
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
In Harris v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
” That case decision, Pamela Harris v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
16-0854Case Style: HIAWATHA HENRY, ADDIE HARRIS, MONTRAY NORRIS, AND ROOSEVELT COLEMAN, JR., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
The justices did not reach the union-fees issue the first time they considered it, in the 2014 case Harris v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
Tornillo), or her money (Harris v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
CASE STYLE AND LINK TO TEXAS SUPREME COURT DOCKET 16-0854HIAWATHA HENRY, ADDIE HARRIS, MONTRAY NORRIS, AND ROOSEVELT COLEMAN, JR. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
On Appeal from the 189th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Case No. 2015-24829. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:44 am
SEIU (2012) and Harris v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:29 pm
By a 5-to-4 vote, the court ruled in the case of Harris v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
Cuomo, building on Harris v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:12 pm
De modo que hay muchas razones "técnicas" para explicar los vótos "tránsfugas" del republicano que votó conforme al interés demócrata y viceversa.Y una de ellas es ... la edad.El tiempo pasa, nos vamos volviendo progresEl caso de Harry Blackmun es interesante: nominado por Nixon, falló con posiciones más "liberals" (incluso redactó Roe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
(granting business owners the right to deny contraception coverage to female employees on religious grounds), and Harris v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:53 am
Quinn, 573 U.S. ___, 134 S. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
Supreme Court cast doubt on the fees in another Illinois case, Harris v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:26 am
IMS Health, or Harris v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Carvin for petitioners (Art Lien) Those are the Justices who made up the majority in a five-to-four ruling in 2014, Harris v. [read post]
