Search for: "Harris v. Quinn" Results 81 - 100 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Kamala Harris to be his running mate, Mario Loyola argues in the National Review that Harris’ past statements expressing openness to expanding the size of the Supreme Court “deserve a lot more attention than they’ve gotten. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:12 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Highland Financial Partners LP & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 809 (14 July 2010) Autofocus Ltd v Accident Exchange Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 788 (14 July 2010) Quinn Direct Insurance Ltd v The Law Society of England and Wales [2010] EWCA Civ 805 (14 July 2010) Harris v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors [2010] EWCA Civ 808 (15 July 2010) Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:13 am by Jon Gelman
"Related articlesSupreme Court: Private contractors not obligated to pay union fees (cbsnews.com)Why SCOTUS's Harris v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:43 am by Tom Smith
One was taken from June 28th-30th, ending the same day that the court handed down its Hobby Lobby decision (and Harris v Quinn for that matter), and after its previously-announced decisions the week before, and the other from July 5-7, at the pitch of the hysterical overreaction to the 5-4 Hobby Lobby result. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
  Correction: Yesterday, I erroneously listed the oral argument date for Harris v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
  Correction: Yesterday, I erroneously listed the oral argument date for Harris v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:20 pm
Argument set for November 4, 2013.Mandatory Dues In Harris v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:25 am
Argument set for November 4, 2013.Mandatory Dues In Harris v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:42 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
All of the interest in the Supreme Court tomorrow is likely to be focused on Hobby Lobby and, to a lesser extent, Harris v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
In Harris v Quinn (Dkt No 11-681), assisted by the National Right to Work Foundation, a group of Medicaid home-based personal care providers filed a class-action federal suit against Illinois Governor Pat Quinn and Illinois SEIU and AFSCME locals over an executive order that designated 20,000 providers as public employees for collective bargaining purposes. [read post]