Search for: "Harris v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2016, 5:31 am
Judge Harry Pregerson In Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:47 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled unanimously [opinion, PDF] Monday in National Meat Association v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
State of Indiana Lloyd Harris v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 5:20 am
Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Scott v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:11 am
See Aramark Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 5:44 pm
One such case is Small v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
United States. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:40 pm
Fifteen state attorneys general have signed this letter to US AG Eric Holder, asking him to appeal the atrocious decision of the US District Court in DC in Beaty v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
Harris. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
Harry Reid has sparked an uproar by suggesting that Mitt Romney paid no taxes. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm
As for Harris v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:42 am
She blames the staff.A bit of substance: Jong-Fast asked Harris about her reaction to the news of the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:07 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Kazadi Appellant was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of manslaughter, first-degree assault and second-degree assault. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
" While many scholars have studied Erie v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:00 pm
California Harris v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:30 am
Barnett Harris (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Is Misdemeanor Cash Bail an Unconstitutional Excessive Fine? [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:54 am
United States of America v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
Raleigh police tracked down her killer, Jason Williford, through what then-police chief Harry Dolan called “gumshoe detective work”: They collected and tested trash discarded by […] [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Trump, it is, as the caption of the Supreme Court's decision unwittingly states: Trump v. [read post]