Search for: "Harris v. Younger" Results 1 - 20 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2025, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
While the doctrine of criminal abstention is now known as "Younger abstention" after the 1971 case Younger v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 7:22 am by INFORRM
It has also specifically admitted wrongdoing against Tom Watson, and admitted unlawful acts by The Sun, as well as by the News of the World, against Prince Harry”. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 1:46 pm by Deirdre Schifeling
Our reproductive freedom firewall work includes continuing to work with local partners on abortion rights ballot measures since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Fancourt J criticised Prince Harry’s individual claim in the phone hacking litigation against News Group Newspapers, stating that “the claim at times resembles more an entrenched front in a campaign between two obdurate but well-resourced armies than a claim for misuse of private information” and is “starting to absorb more than an appropriate share of the court’s resources” [9]. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:24 am by Phil Dixon
Biden under New York Rifle and Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 7:10 pm by Kalvis Golde
Jonathan R. 22-240Issues: (1) Whether federal courts must abstain from interfering with state-court child welfare proceedings under Younger v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
 The one mercy of President Biden's 2022 State of the Union Address was that there was no surprises. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
Breyer would get another shot less than a year later, after Justice Harry Blackmun announced his plans to step down after the court’s 1993-94 term. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Richard Briffault
The Florida 2000 presidential election—which involved the infamous locally designed “butterfly ballot” and the inconsistent local treatment of disputed ballots that led to Bush v. [read post]