Search for: "Harrison v. Defense" Results 1 - 20 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2020, 3:14 pm by fvanloon
The records were produced to Judicial Watch in a January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 2017 request for all communications between Strzok and Page (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Three justices, in dissent, would have applied a bright-line bare metal defense, as contended for by petitioners.[4] The majority eschewed both the invariant bare metal defense and the Third Circuit’s infinitely flexible forseeability test, for a “third way. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Schachtman
When a defense expert witness pointed out that Etminan had failed to adjust for age and gender in his multivariate analysis,[6] he repudiated his findings.[7] Remarkably, when Etminan published his original DPA in 2015, he declared that he had no conflicts, but when he published his repudiation, he disclosed that he “has been an expert witness in Mirena litigation in the past but is no longer part of the litigation. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Equitable defenses or exceptions are not available because of the risk of mutiny—a very real risk when the novel is set. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Good Faith Exception for Warrantless Blood Draws in Illinois Similar to Arizona, in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
  Coats and Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Lt. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
The event will feature a panel of CSIS experts Todd Harrison, Kathleen H. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  As Federalist Harrison Gray Otis explained, the First Amendment  guaranteed “the liberty of writing, publishing, and speaking, one’s thoughts, under the condition of being answerable to the injured party, whether it be the Government or an individual, for false, malicious, and seditious expressions, whether spoken or written. [read post]