Search for: "Harrison v. Defense"
Results 141 - 160
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
” Ibarra v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:54 am
” Moreover, relying on Harrison v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
” Ibarra v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
” Ibarra v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
” Ibarra v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Crawford, No. 06-5059 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded for trial where: 1) the trial court reopened proceedings after the parties' summation and after the jury had been charged and had begun deliberating; 2) the government failed to present an adequate legal explanation that would justify the reopening of the case without a motion from a party; 3) the prosecution elicited testimony that defendant's counsel knew about the evidence in order to… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am
you signed on with San Antonio’s Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, now part of Strasburger & Price. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
11th CircuitLewis v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:04 pm
Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Harrison, 16-1094 (in which the court requested the SG’s views) and Kumar v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:46 pm
Harrison, which holds that the AMMA does not eliminate the “Plain Smell” Doctrine. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
In line with Tews, Deviner, Hurt, Katzenmeier, Harrison, and Meridia, foreign regulatory activity has mostly [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:11 am
Harrison, Frederick J. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
(And the Court now appears to be holding Harrison v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
(And the Court now appears to be holding Harrison v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply ________________________________________________ Harrison v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am
George Harrison, for example, was found to have infringed the copyright in the song “He’s So Fine” when he wrote “My Sweet Lord,” even though the court acknowledged that it was probably a case of unconscious borrowing (see Bright Tunes Music v. [read post]
