Search for: "Harrison v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Every four years, Americans go to the polls to elect the individual who will serve as our chief executive officer, commander in chief of the armed forces, head of state, and who, since the Truman administration, is known by the acronym, POTUS – President of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
IIShortly after taking office in 1969, President Nixon declared a national “war on drugs [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Office of Medicaid has done is distort the case of Doherty v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Office of Medicaid has done is distort the case of Doherty v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
One type is head-of-state immunity, which attaches only to the individual recognized by the United States as the formal leader of the country. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
See Harrison v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
The event will feature a panel of CSIS experts Todd Harrison, Kathleen H. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Recall that Section 3 extended to any "person… who, having previously taken an oath, … as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States" and subsequently engaged in insurrection.123 Thus, no one doubts that executive officers in the Southern states—for example, South Carolina—who had taken an oath prior to the rebellion, were covered by Section… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
He has also published articles on presidential approval ratings during foreign policy crises, Army efforts toward gender integration, and the experiences of Hispanics in the United States Army. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
Because no Texas executive officers enforce SB8 directly, what the U.S. really wants from its injunction is, again, to prevent state judges from hearing these suits, and to prevent state court clerks from docketing them. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
For information about the position, please contact Andrea Harrison at anharrison@icrc.org. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Harrison, 16-1094 (in which the court requested the SG’s views) and Kumar v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Some banks have already hired criminal defense attorneys to represent employees with regard to the investigations. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
"Missouri - "Officer-Shareholder" exclusion in crime policy bars coverage for embezzlement schemeWiley Rein LLPA U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Janus v. [read post]