Search for: "Harrison v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Recall that Section 3 extended to any "person… who, having previously taken an oath, … as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States" and subsequently engaged in insurrection.123 Thus, no one doubts that executive officers in the Southern states—for example, South Carolina—who had taken an oath prior to the rebellion, were covered by Section… [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
Because no Texas executive officers enforce SB8 directly, what the U.S. really wants from its injunction is, again, to prevent state judges from hearing these suits, and to prevent state court clerks from docketing them. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
See Harrison v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
One type is head-of-state immunity, which attaches only to the individual recognized by the United States as the formal leader of the country. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
For information about the position, please contact Andrea Harrison at anharrison@icrc.org. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
The event will feature a panel of CSIS experts Todd Harrison, Kathleen H. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Janus v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Harrison, 16-1094 (in which the court requested the SG’s views) and Kumar v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Hesse worked at Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison for 7 years. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Office of Medicaid has done is distort the case of Doherty v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Office of Medicaid has done is distort the case of Doherty v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
IIShortly after taking office in 1969, President Nixon declared a national “war on drugs [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Some banks have already hired criminal defense attorneys to represent employees with regard to the investigations. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Every four years, Americans go to the polls to elect the individual who will serve as our chief executive officer, commander in chief of the armed forces, head of state, and who, since the Truman administration, is known by the acronym, POTUS – President of the United States. [read post]
