Search for: "Harrison v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Frederick Schauer is David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In the 1888 election, in particular, Republican Senator Benjamin Harrison defeated the Democratic incumbent, Grover Cleveland, although Harrison lost the popular vote by 90,596 votes.[4]  In what is becoming a familiar narrative, it was the third election (and second in twelve years) in which the popular vote winner lost the Electoral College. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:55 am by Chris Seaton
Now an algorithm had the discretion thanks to a state mandate, and that algorithm assigned Judge Waters the case of Bishop v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently examined just such a situation in a case about Title VII retaliation allegation in the case of Jessica Harrison-Harper v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 9:51 am by Harrison Notkin
For more information on the Miglin Principles please refer to Miglin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by CMS
Philip Woodfield, Rachel Harrison and Elizabeth Pouget, who work within the financial services disputes team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court last week in the matter of Singularis Holdings Ltd (In Official Liquidation) (A Company Incorporated in the Cayman Islands) v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd [2019] UKSC 50:  In this leading case on a financial institution’s Quincecare duty of care to its customer, the Supreme Court has… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
In effect, the self help rule (which does not apply in Quebec) states that as long as trespass does not occur when pruning back roots or branches, even if that work then damages the tree, there can be no valid claim for the damage resulting. [read post]