Search for: "Harry Litman" Results 61 - 72 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Northwestern Law Review Online, Daniel Harris observes that “[t]he big surprise on the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
That runaway power would also frustrate Congress’s intent in 1965 to decisively reject the national origin quotas that had dominated U.S. immigration law for decades—quotas roundly denounced by presidents of both parties, including Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Leah Litman examines how the decision to remove U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:53 am by SHG
Harry Litman, former United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania under President Bill Clinton, argues that corrupt intent is what distinguishes the exercise of presidential authority from a constitutional power to obstruction of justice. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  This conceptual distinction first came to the attention of the legal academy via “The Meaning of Original Meaning,” a 1998 article by Mark Greenberg and Harry Litman. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Leah Litman worries that the reconstituted court “will rarely act as a shield for groups — such as undocumented women — who are victimized by the political process. [read post]
Conversely, others, such as former U.S. attorney Harry Litman, counter that Attorney General Merrick Garland “deserves the presumption that, as promised, he is going after insurrectionists ‘at all levels. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Though I note that he spoke about what Congress has done to respond to technology in the public interest much more than what private actors have done; Jessica Litman’s writing on the ways in which private actors have simply decided to ignore the law as written is relevant here.) [read post]